Independent neuropsychological assessment for personal injury and capacity matters

25 years’ clinical experience | Neuropsychology endorsement | ~500 medicolegal reports since 2011

A person wearing a cozy gray sweater is writing on paper with a blue pen at a wooden desk, with a cup of coffee or tea and a closed laptop in the background.

I accept instructions from plaintiff and defendant solicitors, insurers and statutory schemes alike. My opinion is formed on the evidence and does not vary with the party instructing me. Where the evidence does not support the proposition I have been asked to consider, I will say so.

Matters I accept

  • Transport Accident Commission (TAC) matters

  • WorkCover and WorkSafe matters

  • Common law damages claims

  • Medical negligence

  • Public liability

  • Testamentary and financial capacity

  • Decision-making capacity and guardianship or administration matters

Validity of findings

Every assessment I conduct includes validity measures, integrated throughout the battery rather than added at the end.

My reports state plainly whether the results are valid, invalid or indeterminate, and set out the basis for that conclusion. Where validity is compromised, I explain what can and cannot be said on the available data, and what alternative explanations — including genuine impairment, pain, fatigue, medication effects, psychological factors and effort — have been considered. I do not treat a failed validity indicator as proof of deliberate exaggeration, and I do not quietly report scores I know to be uninterpretable.